header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 10 July 2026

Contract

Houssein and others v London Credit Ltd and others [2026] EWCA Civ 830

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the appellants’ appeal against the remitted decision finding that the appellants’ refinancing proposals did not stop interest running and that the contractual default interest rate (4% per month compounded) was not an unenforceable penalty. The appeal concerned a secured loan facility of £1,881,000 granted by London Credit Ltd (LCL) to CEK Investments Ltd (CEK), guaranteed by Mr and Mrs Houssein. Following a first trial in 2023, the judge held the default interest rate was a penalty, but LCL successfully appealed. The matter was remitted for reconsideration. At the remitted hearing, three issues arose: whether the borrowers had done enough to stop interest running on the loan; whether the default interest rate of 3% per month above the standard rate (totalling 4% per month compounded) was a penalty; and if so, whether LCL was entitled to statutory interest. The Court of Appeal held, among other things, that the borrowers’ offers of settlement in March and April 2021 fell far short

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll