header-logo header-logo

14 January 2010
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2009] All ER (D) 233 (Dec)

In considering a complaint of discrimination on the ground of religious belief, contrary to the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003, SI 2003/1660, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that persons with a religious belief were likely to manifest that belief in their conduct. 

In some cases where an employer objected to such a manifestation it might be impossible to see any basis for the objection other than an objection to the belief which it manifested; and in such a case a claim by the employer to be acting on the grounds of the former but not the latter might have been regarded as a distinction without a difference. 

But in other cases there would be a clear and evidently genuine basis for differentiation between the two, and in such a case the fact that the employee’s motivation for the conduct in question might be found in his wish to manifest his religious belief did not mean that that belief was the ground of the employer’s action.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll