header-logo header-logo

14 January 2010
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2009] All ER (D) 233 (Dec)

In considering a complaint of discrimination on the ground of religious belief, contrary to the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003, SI 2003/1660, the Employment Appeal Tribunal held that persons with a religious belief were likely to manifest that belief in their conduct. 

In some cases where an employer objected to such a manifestation it might be impossible to see any basis for the objection other than an objection to the belief which it manifested; and in such a case a claim by the employer to be acting on the grounds of the former but not the latter might have been regarded as a distinction without a difference. 

But in other cases there would be a clear and evidently genuine basis for differentiation between the two, and in such a case the fact that the employee’s motivation for the conduct in question might be found in his wish to manifest his religious belief did not mean that that belief was the ground of the employer’s action.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
"There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
back-to-top-scroll