Bailey (by her father and litigation friend) v Ministry of Defence and another [2008] EWCA Civ 883, [2008] All ER (D) 382 (Jul)
In a case where medical science cannot establish the probability that “but for” an act of negligence the injury would not have happened, but could establish that the contribution of the negligent cause was more than negligible, the “but for” test is modified, and the claimant would succeed.
Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice
Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team
Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team
NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)
NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
