Admiral Taverns (Cygnet) Ltd v Daniel [2008] EWHC 1688, [2008] All ER (D) 274 (Jul)
The restriction imposed by s 89(1) of the Housing Act 1980 on postponing enforcement of a possession order only applies to the court which made the order and not to a court exercising appellate jurisdiction in respect of the order. Where an appellate court considers there is merit in an appeal against a possession order, it has jurisdiction to preserve the position until the appeal is heard.
"Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit...""There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team
Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees
Family lawyers cite financial disincentives for issuing child protection orders
