header-logo header-logo

07 August 2008
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Case law , Discrimination , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Discrimination

Coleman v Attridge Law (Case C- 303/06), [2008] All ER (D) 245 (Jul)

Under Council Directive 2000/78/EC, the prohibition of direct discrimination is not limited only to people who are themselves disabled. Where an employer treats an employee who is not himself disabled less favourably than another employee is or would be treated in a comparable situation, and the less favourable treatment is based on the disability of the employee’s child, whose care is provided primarily by that employee, such treatment is contrary to the prohibition of direct discrimination.

Issue: 7333 / Categories: Case law , Discrimination , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Test Article Upgrade

Test Article Upgrade

"Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit...""There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal—Jack Kelly

Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

NEWS

Family lawyers cite financial disincentives for issuing child protection orders

A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land
Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee
back-to-top-scroll