header-logo header-logo

17 July 2019
Issue: 7849 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Law centre forced to close

Lambeth Law Centre has closed with immediate effect due to lack of funds.

The trustees said this week the centre ‘has faced financial pressures caused by legal aid cuts and increased operating costs.

‘To some degree this was relieved with generous support from our charitable funders, who have understood the need in the community and helped us address it.

‘However, ultimately the funding shortfall, together with issues with VAT calculations, have put the Law Centre in an impossible financial position.’

The law centre opened in Brixton, London in 1981 and covered debt, welfare benefits, community care, employment, discrimination, housing, immigration and public law as well as collaborating with other organisations to tackle poverty and disadvantage.

Nimrod Ben-Cnaan, head of policy and profile at the Law Centres Network (LCN), said Lambeth Law Centre ‘has had a proud record of service to south Londoners priced out of justice’ and the LCN had worked hard to help it avoid closure. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll