header-logo header-logo

23 June 2011
Issue: 7471 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Landlord & tenant

Crown Estate Commissioners v Governors of Peabody Trust and another [2011] EWHC 1467 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 63 (Jun)

Prior to the Housing Act 1988, the principle was well established that if the landlord changed, the tenant was only entitled to the form of tenancy, and security which the new landlord was capable of offering. The literal effect of s 38(5)(d) of the 1988 Act was as follows. Upon the claimant transferring its interest as landlord to another landlord, then the regulated tenants become assured tenants. That was because s 38(1) and (3) of the 1988 Act applied and had the effect of disapplying para 1 of Sch 1 to the 1988 Act.

Accordingly, instead, s 1 of the 1988 Act applied and meant that the tenancies became assured tenancies and could not be protected or housing association tenancies. This was the case even if the new landlord was a private landlord capable of being the grantor of a regulated tenancy pursuant to the Rent Act 1977.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll