header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The justice merry-go-round

The government’s latest criminal justice reforms could be a recipe for disaster, says Andrew Keogh

It is not only the mandated right to legislate that governments enjoy, but also a duty to pass laws that improve the lot of citizens. One must therefore be careful before jumping in to criticise the 68th piece of criminal justice legislation since 1997. The Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill is a mixed bag of reforms with many having the appearance of being designed in haste—always a recipe for disaster as far as criminal justice legislation is concerned.

The impact of the reforms on the legal aid budget is staggering and estimated in the regulatory impact assessment as being in the order of £2m per annum. It remains to be seen, given that the Ministry of Justice is the sponsoring department for the Bill, how this will be funded, except via further cuts in scope of remuneration levels.

SENTENCING AND CONVICTIONS

Part 2 of the Bill deals with sentencing. In reality the Bill simply seeks to correct the perceived mistakes enacted in the Criminal Justice Act 2003, a piece of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll