header-logo header-logo

Justice begins at home

244936

A fair & equitable profession? Joshua Purser & Govindi Deerasinghe explore some troubling research

The legal profession is fond of describing itself as the guardian of fairness. We speak of equality before the law as if it were an agreed fact rather than a principle that must be continually defended. What the inaugural Global Justice 50/50 Report ‘Gender (In)Justice?’ makes patently clear is that the justice sector is failing to meet the standards it demands of others. Across 171 organisations assessed, the picture is consistent and troubling: power remains concentrated in the hands of a narrow demographic, and the legal profession’s internal inequities pose a direct threat to public trust.

The evidence is stark. Men still occupy 71% of top seats in global and regional courts and 80% in internationally operating elite law firms. Leadership is not only overwhelmingly male, but also overwhelmingly drawn from wealthy countries. 81% of holders of highest offices are nationals of high-income countries, while just 1% are women from low-income countries. 25% are men from the US alone. These are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll