header-logo header-logo

11 April 2019
Issue: 7836 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Judicial line
printer mail-detail

Judicial line: 11 April 2019

This week: unlock the interlock—fast; who posts the claim form; costs only interim cash; divorce costs assessments

Final judgment wins

Q Can an interlocutory order be set aside on application after a final judgment which of itself may not be attackable where a set aside would render the final judgment unsustainable?

A No. An application which had this effect would be an abuse of the court’s process as a collateral attack on a final judgment (see, eg, Daniel Terry v BCS Corporate Acceptances Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2422). If an interlocutory order was made without a hearing and close to trial with a CPR 23.10 right to an affected party to apply to set aside or vary within seven days (although such orders are being increasingly made allowing up to six weeks to apply) then it might be that the trial could not proceed until the application had been determined.

‘They’re at the postbox right now’

Q Is it acceptable for the certificate of service of a claim form which has been purportedly served by post to be completed by the conducting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll