header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Judges given guideline on terrorism sentencing

Terrorist supporters face tougher sentences, under proposals put forward by the Sentencing Council in response to legislative change.

In a consultation published this week, ‘Terrorism offences guideline’, the council proposes longer sentences for the ‘encouragement of terrorism’, ‘failure to disclose information about acts of terrorism’ and ‘collection of terrorist information’. The proposals reflect increased statutory maximum sentences introduced by the Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act 2019.

The council also proposes distinguishing between offenders in a position of authority or influence who directly invite support for a proscribed organisation, and one who is reckless when expressing supportive views.

Sentencing guidelines must be followed, unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interest of justice to do so. The consultation ends on 3 December 2019, and the changes would come into effect in early 2020.

Sentencing Council member Mr Justice Goose said: ‘Terrorism offences are extremely serious and can cover a wide range of factual circumstances, making them difficult and sensitive offences to sentence. For this reason, the Council is keen to ensure that the guidelines are kept up to date and fit for purpose.’

Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll