header-logo header-logo

04 October 2018 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Jam tomorrow or just promises?

Steve Hynes welcomes the Labour party’s commitment to widening access to justice & hopes the government will track back from LASPO

At a fringe meeting on access to justice at the Labour party conference in Liverpool last week Labour’s shadow Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary Richard Burgon, was making bold statements about restoring civil legal aid and increasing the number of Law Centres. He told the meeting held on 24 September: ‘After ten years of austerity access to justice is more important than ever.’ Perhaps not surprisingly his comments went down well with a large audience of lawyers and activists.

Lord Willy Bach also spoke at the event. He told the meeting that just before he left office as legal aid minister in April 2010 the number of cases supported by legal aid peaked before beginning to fall away under the coalition government. They fell off a cliff he said with the introduction of LASPO (The Legal Aid and Sentencing of Offenders Act 2012). According to Bach: ‘Of all the objectional legislation passed under the coalition government LASPO was the worst of all.’ LASPO,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll