header-logo header-logo

27 June 2013
Issue: 7566 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Iran bank wins sanctions case

Supreme Court rules in favour of Bank Mellat

Bank Mellat, Iran’s largest private bank, was wrongly included on the Iran nuclear sanctions list, the Supreme Court has ruled.

In two linked judgments, nine justices held by majority that the Treasury must lift sanctions against the bank, dismissing claims that its banking services facilitated Iran’s nuclear programme, and said appeal courts should go into closed session only where “it has been convincingly demonstrated to be genuinely necessary in the interests of justice”.

The court held a “closed material procedure” (CMP) for the first time in this case, to hear sensitive material about the bank, in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury [2013] UKSC 38; 39.

The controversial Justice and Security Act 2013 expanded the use of closed courts into the main civil courts.

Delivering judgment, Lord Sumption said the bank received no notice of the listing: “The duty to give advance notice and an opportunity to be heard to a person against whom a draconian statutory power is to be exercised is one of the oldest principles of what would not be called public law.”

Sarosh Zaiwalla, senior partner, Zaiwalla & Co Solicitors, which acted for the Bank, says: “The judgment will put enormous confidence in the independence of the British judiciary.”

Issue: 7566 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll