header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 July 2014
Issue: 7613 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration—Asylum seeker—Freedom of religion

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

R (on the application of B) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 854; [2014] All ER (D) 183 (Jun)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Dyson MR, Moses and Patten LJJ, 24 June 2014

Removal to France of an asylum seeking minor who wished to wear a burqa, and her father, would not constitute a flagrant violation of the applicant’s rights under Arts 8 or 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, despite the French ban on the burqa in public places.

Sibghat Kadri QC and Rashid Ahmed (instructed by Britannia Law Practice LLP) for the applicants. David Mankell (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the secretary of state. Satvinder Juss (instructed by HSBS Law Solicitors) appeared by way of written submissions for the Sikh Council Hampshire as intervener.

The applicants were a father and his daughter (born in 2002) who were Iranian nationals. Both were practising Muslims who believed that females should cover their heads in public. The father contended that he had been forced to leave Iran because

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll