header-logo header-logo

An ill wind?

Charles Pigott takes time out to revisit statutory holiday entitlement

The advocate general’s opinion in the German reference KHS AG v Schulte C-214/10 addresses what should happen to a worker’s holiday entitlement under the Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC (WTD) when a period of continuous sick leave straddles more than one leave year. This question had previously been considered by the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) in Schultz-Hoff v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund [2009] All ER (EC) 906, [2009] IRLR 214. Schultz-Hoff appeared to have left open the possibility that in these circumstances holiday entitlement could accrue indefinitely, assuming that under local law it could not be taken concurrently with sick leave.

In Schultz-Hoff, another German reference, the worker had been off sick from September 2004 until his contract terminated in September 2005. He claimed a payment in lieu of his accrued holiday entitlement for two leave years but was denied his 2004 entitlement by the local courts because the permitted carry-over period was limited to three months. The ECJ held that restricting his ability to carry forward his entitlement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll