header-logo header-logo

The human touch

nlj_7707_walker

Constructive dismissal upholds the law of contract, but with a human touch, says Tom Walker

  • The contractual nature of constructive dismissal.

Constructive dismissal is all about contract law. It serves as a tonic to us employment lawyers. We are so used to our questions of fairness, reasonable investigation and legitimate aims that now and then it is good for us to adjust our minds to the pure law of contract. For example, it is all too easy to assume that a constructive dismissal is an unfair dismissal and confuse the two concepts. Perhaps the best reminder of the difference is the case of Farrant v Woodroffe School (1997) EAT/1117/96, [1998] IRLR 176.

A technician at a school was asked to teach another subject where there was under-staffing. He refused. The headteacher, mistakenly believing that he had a contractual right to impose the change, consulted with the technician and then implemented the decision. Mr Farrant resigned. There was a constructive dismissal in that there was no contractual right to make such a change. It was not unfair though; there was a genuine

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll