header-logo header-logo

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Freedom of religion—Prisoners

R (on the application of Bashir) v Independent Adjudicator and others [2011] EWHC 1108 (Admin)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (Manchester District Registry), Judge Pelling QC, 25 May 2011

The failure properly to consider the right to freedom of religion under Art 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights rendered the requirement to take a urine sample during a personal fast by a devout Muslim a breach of that right.

Vijay Jagadesham (instructed by Burton Copeland LLP) for the claimant. John Joliffe (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendants.

The claimant was at all material times a prisoner at HM Prison Rye Hill. On 20 January 2010, he was required to provide a urine sample for testing for the use of controlled drugs in accordance with the policy in relation to mandatory drug testing contained in Prison Service Order 3601. The basis on which the test was said to be based was a reasonable suspicion that the claimant had taken controlled substances. He was offered water before providing the sample, but refused on the ground that he was a devout Muslim who was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll