header-logo header-logo

30 September 2020 / Satvinder S Juss
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Equality , Diversity , Human rights
printer mail-detail

How the law came to support slavery

28456
Satvinder Juss investigates the shocking legal justifications that were used to excuse slavery

In the aftermath of the toppling of the slaver Edward Colston’s statue in Bristol, we saw the ambivalence of those who applauded this as a pivotal moment in understanding the wealth of our cities and those who saw it as violation of a historic heritage. The ensuing controversy, however, obscured the ambivalence of the law, which is yet to be fully investigated in this much overlooked period of our history. The five men who, on 7 June 2020, allegedly unseated the statute from its plinth during a Black Lives Matter demonstration, and rolled it into Bristol harbour, are set to acquire unexpected fame. This is because they have been given cautions on the condition they give evidence to the Mayor of Bristol’s History Commission.

Cartwrights Case in 1569 was the first recorded case of a slave before the English courts, and concerned a slave from Russia. The court famously ruled that the air of England was too pure for slaves to breathe

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll