header-logo header-logo

23 April 2009 / Peter Ambrose
Issue: 7366 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

HIP operation

HIPs—will they finally provide benefits? asks Peter Ambrose

The credibility of HIPs is certainly not helped by the lack of understanding among HIP providers of basic property legal issues, so it is hardly surprising that faith is often lacking in the accuracy of documents that they produce.

Until 6 April, most estate agents and clients had little to fear about the timely and accurate production of documentation. If the agent could be given an energy chart for their property particulars, then everyone was happy. This limited requirement clearly benefited those HIP providers with scant legal knowledge and ensured that HIPs remained as merely a legal formality that must be completed before contracts could be exchanged.

However, as sellers must now disclose more information about their property and the removal of the crutch of personal search insurance, issues concerning accountability and liability have come to the fore, and the emphasis has switched towards legal matters and responsibility for content.

Information questionnaire

Sellers must now complete a Property Information Questionnaire (PIQ) before an estate agent is allowed to market their property. This document, a cut-down version of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll