header-logo header-logo

Hands off!

Employers must be proactive in stopping third-party sexual harassment to employees, or risk discrimination claims. Richard Nicolle explains

Since 6 April 2008, employers may be vulnerable to damages claims from their employees if they knowingly fail to protect them from repeated sexual harassment by a third party. If customers or clients harass staff, they can sue their boss.

The Employment Equality (Sex Discrimination) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/2467) (2005 Regulations) amended the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975) to implement the European Equal Treatment Amendment Directive (the Directive) which expressly prohibited sexual harassment. However, in 2007 the Equal Opportunities Commission (EOC) mounted a successful challenge to the 2005 Regulations in the High Court (Equal Opportunities Commission v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] EWHC 483 (Admin), [2007] IRLR 327).

The court found that the 2005 Regulations did not adequately provide the protections required by the Directive or reflect the government's interpretation of the domestic provisions as set out in their own guidance. The court's decision required that the government amend the relevant provisions of SDA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll