header-logo header-logo

02 June 2021 / Shabina Begum , Marisa Razeek
Issue: 7935 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Equality , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Halt the hijab hijack

50376
Global rhetoric has commandeered the hijab for political power plays: the choice of what to wear should be for each woman to decide for herself, say Shabina Begum & Marisa Razeek

Throughout history, we have witnessed people in power politicising religion. In more recent times, the societal pressure placed on Muslim women, often formed by the cultural patriarchy, is immense. And it seems that the easiest and most visible way to do so, is to dictate a woman’s hijab, or her covering.

In a number of majority-Muslim countries, a woman is either legislated, regulated, or compelled socially to wear the hijab. In an increasing number of countries where Muslims are in the minority, Muslim women are restricted or prohibited from wearing the hijab in certain spaces, and may be excluded from assistance or access to basic necessities if they still choose to wear their hijab. Unfortunately, and unsurprisingly, these rules mainly adversely impact Muslim women. These rules either would restrict or prevent them from accessing education, employment, or economic development opportunities.

In the UK, this played

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll