header-logo header-logo

25 September 2009
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Google favoured in trademark dispute

Google has received encouraging news in its long-running legal battle over whether its AdWords service infringes trademark rights.

Google has received encouraging news in its long-running legal battle over whether its AdWords service infringes trademark rights.

The AdWords service allows advertisers to purchase the right to have their advert displayed when certain keywords are typed into the Google search engine.

Louis Vuitton complained that adverts for counterfeit items popped up when internet users searched for the company, which infringed their trademark rights.

The resulting case was referred to the European Court of Justice.
Delivering his opinion in the joined cases of C-236/08, C-237/08 and C- 238/08, Advocate General Poiares Maduro said Google did not infringe anyone’s trademark rights by selling keywords corresponding to those trademarks.

An advocate general’s opinion is not legally binding on the court, but is usually followed.

Maduro said: “The question, as put to the court, is whether the use of a keyword which corresponds to a trade mark can, in itself, be regarded as a use of that trade mark which is subject to the consent of its proprietor.”

On whether an infringement had taken place, he said: “Trade mark proprietors have no legal problem in tackling counterfeit sites, as such sites are clearly involved in trade mark infringements; however, the practical difficulties of doing so should not be ignored.”

 

Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Intellectual property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll