header-logo header-logo

19 July 2012 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The good, the bad & the ugly

Roger Smith rounds up recent human rights developments

As we limp towards the summer holidays, the secretary of state for justice gives an end of term performance; the party season gets under way; and the Bill of Rights Commission knocks out another consultation.

Clarke in conversation

Ken Clarke was in typical form at a Justice question and answer event. His responses encompassed the good, the bad and the ugly. On the good side, the secretary of state defended the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). He revealed that he had been a bit “iffy” when the idea of the Human Rights Act had originally been mooted but was persuaded by Geoffrey Howe that it was a good idea. He continued to think that HRA 1998 had been wilfully misunderstood by the media and asserted that support was currently coalition policy—which is, as he knows full well, technically correct, though David Cameron and many other Tories are against HRA 1998. On the bad side, he was typically bullish in defence of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll