header-logo header-logo

Gender critical cases: sex matters

177107
Complaints about discrimination in relation to any protected characteristic should lead to robust investigations, not heresy hunts, say Maya Forstater & Anya Palmer

Writing in NLJ recently, Oscar Davies, a barrister at Garden Court Chambers, said that the law was ‘tying itself in knots over gender critical cases’ (see ‘Gender critical cases: making bad law?’, NLJ, 26 April 2024). In fact, since 2021, when the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that gender critical beliefs were ‘worthy of respect in a democratic society’, tribunals have drawn a series of straight lines between discriminatory conduct and employer liability.

The first organisation to be found liable for gender critical discrimination was Garden Court itself. In July 2022, an employment tribunal ruled that Garden Court had discriminated against one of its barristers, Allison Bailey, in its response to people complaining about her view that people cannot change their biological sex. The tribunal found that Garden Court had discriminated against Bailey, and victimised her, in publicly stating that she was under investigation and in upholding the complaint.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll