header-logo header-logo

12 March 2025
Issue: 8108 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Training & education , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Fund launched to open doors for aspiring solicitors

A £360,000 fund to support about 190 aspiring solicitors from disadvantaged backgrounds has been launched by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Only organisations—not the individuals concerned—are eligible to apply for the SQE Access and Reinvestment Fund. They will be asked to show how their schemes support aspiring solicitors who face barriers to entry such as a disability, family estrangement or background in a cared for setting.

If successful, they can use their allocation to cover the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) entry fees of candidates they have selected for support.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘We do not want to see talented individuals being held back by financial constraints and other personal challenges.’

The fund is generated by payments from SQE provider Kaplan. The deadline for applications is 30 April, and more information is available here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll