header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 November 2023 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Fraudulent trading: a forensic accountant’s perspective

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
147351
Rakesh Kapila considers the financial aspects of fraudulent trading
  • Types of fraudulent trading.
  • Information to be examined.
  • Issues relating to the financial position of the business.

A person commits the offence of fraudulent trading if he or she is knowingly party to the carrying on of a business either with intent to defraud creditors or for any other fraudulent purpose. Although defendants in fraudulent trading cases are often company directors, the Fraud Act 2006 extended the scope of the offence to include sole traders and partners. The offence may ‘catch’ professional advisers acting in executive roles.

Fraudulent trading occurs when a business continues to trade at a time when there is, to the knowledge of the business’s management, no reasonable prospect of creditors ever receiving payment. This includes a situation in which there are no good grounds for thinking that the business can pay its debts even if its management considers that it can. The standard is objective.

In order to appreciate the types of fraudulent trading and the associated financial issues, it is necessary to grasp key concepts

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll