header-logo header-logo

Flying high

istock_000015703940medium_4

Charles Pigott reports on soaring retirement ages

Last month’s decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Prigge v Deutsche Lufthansa AG C-447/09 is about three German airline pilots who were made to retire at 60. Their employer relied on a term in a collective agreement providing for automatic termination of their employment at the age of 60. Both German and international aviation legislation allows pilots to continue to fly between the ages of 60 and 65 as long as they do so as part of a crew with at least one pilot under the age of 60.

Abiding by the Directive

The ECJ had to decide whether the collective agreement infringed the Employment Framework Directive (2000/78/EC). It needed to look at three provisions of the Directive:
 

  • Article 2(5), which excludes measures from the scope of the Directive which, among other things, are necessary for the protection of health;
  • Article 4(1), which creates an exemption for a “genuine and determining occupational requirement, provided that the objective is legitimate and the requirement is proportionate”; and
  • Article 6(1), which
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll