header-logo header-logo

08 July 2026
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Criminal
printer mail-detail

First immigration sentencing guidelines set out

The Sentencing Council has launched draft guidelines for facilitation and endangering another person during a sea crossing to the UK

They relate to the offence introduced by s 21 of the Border, Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025. The consultation revisits a draft guideline opened to consultation in March 2024, which covers the Immigration Act 1971 offences of assisting unlawful immigration to the UK—responses from that consultation are included in the consultation document.

There are currently no sentencing guidelines for immigration offences. The statutory maximum for endangering another during a sea crossing is six years in prison, and the statutory maximum for facilitation is life imprisonment.

Lady Justice May, chair of the Sentencing Council, said: ‘These are serious offences that put lives at risk.

‘The statutory maximum sentence for facilitation offences is life imprisonment. It’s important that the guidelines reflect the complexity and severity of these cases, so that sentencers can be confident in the approach they take when dealing with them.’

The consultation ends on 30 September.

Issue: 8169 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll