header-logo header-logo

22 November 2023
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-detail

Firms fined

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has issued its first fixed penalties

Three law firms received £750 fines last week for failing to comply with the SRA’s transparency rules. Breaches included failure to publish information explaining key stages and likely timescales for services, failure to publish details on experience and qualifications of those working on areas covered by the rules, and failure to include information on disbursement costs and VAT in published prices.

The SRA, which introduced its fixed penalty regime in May, said it has other live cases which could result in fixed penalties for not complying with the transparency rules. Non-compliance could lead to a second fine of £1,500.

Paul Philip, Chief Executive of the SRA, said: ‘We brought in fixed penalties so we could deal with non-complex breaches of our rules more swiftly.’

Issue: 8050 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll