header-logo header-logo

30 March 2007 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A financial performance

Theatrics used to unveil the budget do not hide the impact of taxation and timing, says Peter Vaines

Gordon Brown started his Budget speech in cracking form with some payback comments directed at former colleagues who had been sniping at him earlier in the week. And he ended it with a moment of pure theatre. He got to that part of the Budget where he commends it to the House but just before those words were uttered he said something like “oh sorry I forgot to mention, I’m reducing income tax by 2p to 20%”, and sat down.

Poor Mr Cameron. He had already written his reply, assuming he could amend it slightly as the Chancellor ploughed through the boring bits, but this last line gave him only 15 seconds to take it in. These theatricals may have been appropriate for Budget Day, but did not distract the analysts who gave the Budget a serious thumbs down.

It is an extraordinary feature that most changes do not relate to the forthcoming year. The corporation tax changes are perhaps the most inexplicable. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll