header-logo header-logo

29 July 2011 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Fight for the right

zrc011_4

Ian Smith enters into the tussle between employment law & human rights

The column this month is, unusually, devoted to only one case. There are currently an unusual number of cases on employment law before the Supreme Court. One very important one on whether and, if so, when “loss of career” damages may be awarded in a common law action was heard towards the end of June (Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Trust) and its result is awaited with a mixture of fascination and trepidation. In the meantime, we have had the first judgment in the forthcoming series of them, concerning the always controversial area of the interaction of employment law and human rights law, this time in the context of rights to representation before internal disciplinary hearings.

The question of representation

R (G) v Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 30, [2011] All ER (D) 220 (Jun) is the much awaited Supreme Court decision on the question which has arisen in the last couple of years as to whether there is ever a right

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll