header-logo header-logo

23 June 2016
Issue: 7704 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Fee hikes attacked by MPs

Justice Select Committee calls on MoJ to release review

MPs have spoken out against fee hikes for court users in the civil and family courts and tribunals.

In a report published last week, the Justice Select Committee called on the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to release its post-implementation review of employment tribunal fees, abandon plans to double the £10,000 cap on civil court fees, and halt plans to raise divorce fees from £410 to £550.

It noted that the introduction of issue fees and hearing fees for claimants in the employment tribunals led to a drop in the number of cases brought of nearly 70%. It said factors such as fee remission, vulnerability of claimants and equality of arms should be taken into account when setting fee rates.

Chantal-Aimee Doerries QC, Bar chairman, accused the MoJ of taking a “shot in the dark” approach to imposing court and tribunal fees.

“The committee found what we, and others (including the judiciary), had been saying all along: the MoJ’s evidence base for the charges was flimsy, and insufficient time was allowed to assess the impact of other, concurrent changes in the civil justice system. The reality is that employees, small businesses and others who may have a legitimate claim are being denied the chance to pursue it because of fees which they cannot afford.

“The MoJ now has an opportunity to learn from its mistakes and, as the Committee recommends and as we echo, hold off from its latest plans to restrict access to the Immigration & Asylum Tribunal by increasing fees by 500%.”

On the rise in divorce fees, Nigel Shepherd, chair, Resolution, says: “The committee rightly recognises that this rise effectively amounted to a new tax on divorce; and that by raising it, people were being charged around twice what it actually costs to process a divorce petition.”

Issue: 7704 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll