header-logo header-logo

19 April 2024 / David Burrows
Issue: 8067 / Categories: Features , In Court , Family , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Family law & the judicial line of influence

168631
David Burrows pays tribute to the enduring work of a legion of influential family judges
  • Covers seminal judgments by family court judges, including Lord Scarman, Lord Nicholls and Lady Hale.

What influence have individual judges had on the development and practice of family law over the past 30 or 40 years? Through those years the shadow—mostly benign—of the Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) has been long. So too has the Human Rights Act 1998 and all must be seen through the procedural prism of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR 1998) and its pale imitation, the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010). But how has the common law progressed?

Development of the common law by presidents of the Family Division has been slight. It is hampered by the varied roles assigned to individual presidents. None have made a real mark on the law, even Munby P for all his administrative schemes and passion for ‘transparency’. The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 defined separation of powers principles for the Lord Chancellor. It did not extend to the administration

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll