header-logo header-logo

15 May 2019
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Child law
printer mail-detail

Family Division president pays tribute to Children Act

The Children Act 1989 ‘has more than stood the test of time’, Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the Family Division, has said.

Giving the Nicholas Wall Memorial Lecture 2019 last week, he said the drafting was ‘superb’, and subsequent changes have been seen as embellishments or extensions rather than radical reform.

One sign of its flexibility, he said, is that the Family Court can make protection orders for children involved in gang culture or running ‘county lines’ if social services apply for a care order.

Unfortunately, knives are now a problem. At the Central Family Court in London’s Holborn, Sir Andrew said, 473 knives with blades more than three inches long were confiscated during security checks in the first four months of 2019. A further 320 knives were found deposited in the precincts immediately outside the court entrance.

Issue: 7840 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Child law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll