header-logo header-logo

27 January 2012 / Kim Beatson
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , EU , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Failing to go the distance

Kim Beatson investigates the struggle to establish jurisdiction in pre-nuptial cases

The EU provides for citizens to live and work in fellow member states which can lead to disharmony between the civil law jurisdictions of Europe which generally employ notarised marital property regimes and the common law jurisdictions which attach no property consequences to marriage and rely on judicial discretion.

Difficulties have arisen as separating couples have raced to seize jurisdiction, not choosing the jurisdiction with which the marriage has the closest connection, but deliberately concentrating on the financial outcome.

English advantage

It is not, therefore, surprising that the most prominent recent case law on pre-nuptial agreements involves foreign nationals seeking advantage from the English courts.

Most practitioners will be familiar with the case of Granatino v Radmacher [2010] UKSC 42, [2011] 1 All ER 373. The Supreme Court judgment was handed down in October 2010 when Nicholas Granatino, a French-born banker, challenged the Court of Appeal ruling which reduced his divorce settlement from his former wife, Katrin Radmacher from £5.85m to £1m.

At the first hearing,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll