header-logo header-logo

10 December 2021 / Kim Beatson , Victoria Rylatt
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Fact Finding Hearings in private children proceedings

66825
In the first of a two-part series, Kim Beatson & Victoria Brown provide an expert guide to split hearings
  • A cut out and keep guide to Fact Finding Hearings in private children proceedings.
  • The definitions of domestic abuse, the burden of proof as well as evidential and practical issues.

A ‘Fact Finding Hearing’ (FFH) is the first limb of a split hearing, which is a hearing divided into two parts. In the first half, the court makes findings of fact on issues identified by the parties or the court and recorded in a Scott Schedule. During the second part, the court decides the case based on the findings.

When are they held?

An FFH is not always necessary. Practice Direction 12J of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 (PD 12J) contains detailed guidance on determining whether or not it is necessary to conduct an FFH with respect to allegations of domestic abuse.

Often there will be a clear and stark issue such as sexual or serious physical abuse or serious mental abuse such as controlling or coercive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll