header-logo header-logo

07 September 2012
Issue: 7528 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Extradition—Convention rights—Polish extradition

Krolik and others v Several Judicial Authorities of Poland [2012] EWHC 2357 (Admin), [2012] All ER (D) 107 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (London), Sir John Thomas P and Globe J, 17 August 2012

The Administrative Court has given guidance on the future treatment of appeals against extradition to Poland where an appellant relies upon the alleged prison conditions in Poland to support a submission under Art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention).

Mark Smith (instructed under the Direct Access Scheme) for the appellants. Hannah Pye and Katherine Tyler (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the judicial authorities.

Six extradition appeals were listed together as in each case the sole issue was the same, namely whether to extradite the appellants under either accusation or conviction European Arrest Warrants would be a breach of Art 3 of the Convention by reason of prison conditions in Poland. One of the purposes of hearing the six appeals together was to enable the court to set out the way in which it would deal with any further appeals raising the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll