header-logo header-logo

21 December 2011
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunal fees on the horizon

Workers could be charged up to £2,350 to bring an employment tribunal claim, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced.

An MoJ consultation, published last week, puts forward two options:

■ a fee of between £150-£250 to begin a claim, plus between £250-£1250 for a hearing, with no limit on the maximum award; or
■ a single fee of between £200-£600 where the maximum award is limited to £30,000, with the option of an additional fee of £1,750 where the claimant seeks an award above this amount.

Although claimants will pay the fees initially, the unsuccessful party will bear the cost of the fees. Fee waivers will be available in certain circumstances, for example, people on benefits couples whose income is less than £18,000, or couples with two children whose income is less than £23,860. The government will continue to fund Acas.

Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly said the proposals would save the taxpayer £84m.
Employment lawyer Esther Smith, partner at Thomas Eggar, says: “If a cost system is implemented, which I think it should, it must not deter people with genuine claims but no means to pay the fees. 

“In addition, care needs to be taken to ensure that the cost system implemented does not give rise to a new legal insurance industry, setting up whizzy schemes to fund people's claims for them out of future compensation. A fee structure related to the value of the claim being pursued would be a sensible starting point. It would also ensure that claimants confirmed the value of the claim they were pursuing early, and they would then be bound to stick to this, or a lower figure as the claim progressed.  

“This in itself should aid early settlement of claims, as all too often claims proceed to hearing on legal points, without the claimants or their representatives giving any real thought to the value of what they are arguing about. The structure of fees related to the stated value of the claim would also deter people from initially over valuing or over estimating their claim at the outset.”

The consultation, Charging Fees in Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal, ends on 6 March 2012 and the fees are due to be introduced after 2013-2014. There were 218,100 claims to employment tribunals in 2010-11, a 44%  increase on 2008-09.
 
 
 

Issue: 7495 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll