header-logo header-logo

20 October 2016 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7719 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 20 October 2016

nlj_7719_smith

Ian Smith rounds up the latest employment news

  • Old principles of fair treatment of staff in employment law abut on to the modern laws on child protection.
  • When can you establish an oral express term in a contract of employment, when there is no supporting documentary evidence?
  • Who is a “client” in a TUPE case?
  • When is a union liable for the acts of its elected official?

At a time when the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse is sinking into major problems of staffing, scope and timing, it is perhaps appropriate that the first case this month concerns the serious difficulties encountered when old principles of fair treatment of staff in employment law abut on to the modern laws on child protection. It split the Court of Appeal fundamentally, with the doyen of employment law, Elias LJ, being contradicted by a noted family law judge, and the third lord justice siding with the latter in no uncertain terms. This circle is proving to be particularly hard to square. The other cases pose three interesting questions, of a relatively

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll