header-logo header-logo

10 February 2021 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7920 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 12 February 2021

38897
Internal procedures, constructive dismissals & the slippery slope of indirect discrimination: Ian Smith offers some expert tuition
  • Using internal procedures does not rule out a later constructive dismissal claim.
  • Court of Appeal rules on how to deal with a request to extend time in a discrimination case.
  • Two helpful examples of indirect sex discrimination cases.

The first case considered in this brief is an important one in practice for employees faced with really bad treatment by the employer, potentially unacceptable, but wanting to at least try to resolve matters internally before walking out and losing their job: if they use the employer’s grievance or appeal procedure, do they thereby jeopardise their right to claim constructive dismissal? The second case, on how to adjudicate on an application to extend the time limit for a discrimination claim, shares one aspect with the first case, namely that the answer has been uncertain for some time, given the importance of the questions. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has (hopefully) resolved the first question, and the Court of Appeal has definitely resolved

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll