header-logo header-logo

Employment law brief: 11 July 2025

225418
Taking the recent heatwave in his stride, Ian Smith (not pictured) introduces the Magnificent Six
  • Capability dismissals and the overlap with SOSR.
  • Redundancy dismissals and the search for alternative work.
  • Early conciliation; the s 207B(3) extension of the time limit.
  • Striking out for failure to comply with ET orders; relevance of an unless order instead
  • Procedure at hearing; splitting or combining liability and remedy.
  • Costs orders, discrimination cases and litigants in person.

What the six cases considered in this month’s brief have in common is that they are all concerned with precise but important points of interpretation—a common feature of our complex employment law. In unfair dismissal law, they cover the overlap between capability and some other substantial reason, and the importance of the search for alternative employment in redundancy cases. There are then four cases on employment tribunal (ET) procedure, covering ACAS early conciliation; striking out for failure to carry out ET orders; when to use combined hearings rather than splitting liability and remedy; and how to approach a costs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll