header-logo header-logo

24 January 2025 / Ian Smith
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Features , Employment , Tribunals , TUPE
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 24 January 2025

204792
Ian Smith recommends a stiff drink & a towel around the head before plunging into the latest cases on TUPE, fair dismissal & enhanced compensation
  • Holiday pay: the effect of bankruptcy and an award of ‘interest like compensation’.
  • Breakdown of trust and confidence as a form of fair dismissal.
  • TUPE transfers and the right to object: a reappraisal.

We enter 2025 with the medium-term prospect of the Employment Rights Bill grinding its way through Parliament (with cries of ‘anti-business disaster’ from one side and ‘betrayal’ from the other), and the short-term reality of new Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (largely repeating the present ones, but with the delightful prospect for Harvey editors of changes in their numbering), which came into force on 6 January. The cases considered here are a fairly typical mixture of the sort that we tend to get across the employment law spectrum, each of which is significant in its own area. The first concerns the effect of bankruptcy on a holiday pay claim and how an employment tribunal (ET), in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll