header-logo header-logo

28 November 2013 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7586 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Employment law brief: 28 November 2013

web_smith

Ian Smith reports on reasonable adjustments & frustration; normal working hours; & an employer’s duty to cough up for medical treatment

The first case this month illustrates the interplay between the old law of frustration and the modern law of disability discrimination, which has not surfaced before in a reported case. The second case shows that, even where only statute law is concerned, there can still be problems aligning it with common sense (if not common law); the context is the relatively abstruse area of guarantee payments, but the issue in general is one of wider import. The third case examines reasonable adjustments, showing the possible complications when one leaves the relatively safe harbour of adjustments purely to the job itself and enters the less navigable waters of wider possible ameliorations, especially in relation to medical treatment.

The interplay between reasonable adjustments & frustration

The doctrine of frustration is well established in employment law, even if in practice it is likely to be found only rarely. The case law on it is now quite old and the decision of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll