header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7586

29 November 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

Human rights lawyer is honoured in NYC

Bernard Pressman analyses the “new” approach of the courts to applications for relief from sanctions

Challenging a local authority on procedural grounds can prove difficult, as Tim Spencer-Lane reports

When does a failure to prosecute health & safety violations breach human rights? Kate Beattie reports

Threlfall v ECD Insight Ltd and another [2013] EWCA Civ 1444, [2013] All ER (D) 195 (Nov)

Preparados Alimenticos, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) T-377/10, [2013] All ER (D) 218 (Nov)

Re L (leave to oppose making of adoption order) [2013] EWCA Civ 1481, [2013] All ER (D) 264 (Nov)

Dixons Retail plc v Revenue and Customs Commissioners C-494/12, [2013] All ER (D) 239 (Nov)

Venn v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and others [2013] EWHC 3546 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 202 (Nov)

Douglas v Ministry of Justice [2013] EWHC 3640 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 253 (Nov)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll