header-logo header-logo

14 February 2014
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment

United States of America v Nolan [2014] EWCA Civ 71, [2014] All ER (D) 36 (Feb)

In proceedings concerning an employee of a US military base in the UK, the employer argued that the provisions of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 did not apply to the case of workers employed by any public administrative body and establishment governed by public law (PAB) within the meaning of Art 1.2 of Council Directive (EC) 98/59 (on the approximation of the laws of the member states relating to collective redundancies). The court held that, in transposing the Directive into domestic legislation, the draftsman had made what had to have been a deliberate choice not to reproduce in terms the general exclusion contained in the Directive for PAB workers. Instead, an exclusion had been made for “Crown employment”. It was clear that the concept of a PAB in Community law was wider than Crown employment. That had to have been apparent to the draftsman and there was no warrant for assuming that he nonetheless had intended, but incompetently failed, to provide for an exclusion which had precisely corresponded

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll