header-logo header-logo

20 September 2013
Issue: 7576 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Employment

Czarnecki v Choice Textiles Ltd UKEAT/0331/12/GE, [2013] All ER (D) 77 (Sep)

In determining a claim for arrears of pay, it was settled law that: (i) the starting point was the contract of employment; (ii) if the contract of employment entitled the employee at least to consideration of the exercise of a discretion, it would be a breach of that contract not to consider its exercise; (iii) where a discretion was said to be exercisable only upon some prior facts having been established, there could be no question factually of any award becoming payable unless those factual preconditions were satisfied; (iv) if the discretion had been exercised, then the exercise might be reviewed; (v) if the discretion had not been exercised then the employee was entitled to be put into the position in which he would have been if the contract had been fully and properly performed; (vi) in such a situation the employer would have given proper consideration to the exercise of the discretion; (vii) the task in assessing compensation for the breach therefore, was to ask what that employer, acting neither irrationally nor perversely would have decided

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll