header-logo header-logo

07 April 2020
Issue: 7882 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-detail

Employers grapple with COVID-19

More than three-quarters of employers have furloughed some staff or plan to do so, according to benchmarking research by law firm Lewis Silkin into the impact of COVID-19

The firm surveyed 67 in-house counsel or senior human resources leaders across major businesses on their use of the Job Retention (furlough) Scheme, under which the government pays 80% of salary up to a maximum of £2,500 per month. Only 23% of respondents haven’t furloughed anyone and don’t think it will be necessary. Of those making full use of the scheme, only 13% plan to rotate staff who are on furlough at any one time.

More than 65% are topping up the government subsidy, and nearly 45% are topping up to full pay.

Amid stories such as the airline pilot now working as a Tesco delivery driver to help out during the pandemic, 84% of employers said they have no objection if furloughed staff wish to work for the NHS, social care, supermarkets or other essential service. Only 9% of employers have asked staff to undertake training while furloughed.

Those employees still working face considerable uncertainty―more than a third of businesses are seeking to cut pay or hours.

However, employers are also taking the initiative in supporting those working from home, with 84% proactively encouraging social interaction among employees, 73% providing information on safe workstation set up and 29% laying on extra mental health support services.

James Davies, employment partner at Lewis Silkin, said: ‘As businesses adjust to the new normal, minds will inevitably turn to seeking ways to mitigate the longer-term impact of the disruption and even planning ahead for a brighter future.

‘This might include rolling out training initiatives, both to maintain company culture and also to prepare staff for successful re-introduction once they are brought back fully into the workplace.’

Issue: 7882 / Categories: Legal News , Covid-19 , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll