header-logo header-logo

03 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Drain the “toxic lake”

What can be done to ease the burden of the individual taxpaying debtor?

Giving UK taxpayers a “statutory amnesty” could help drain the “swamp of toxic debt”, a QC has suggested.

Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Thompson QC says the toxic assets that started the global recession in 2008 included not only sub-prime mortgages but also sub-prime loans in the form of unsecured loan facilities provided by credit cards.

He identifies a “toxic lake” of £325bn sitting in the individual budgets of millions of debtors who borrowed more than they could pay. Now the bailout has squeezed the poison from the banking system, he asks, can anything be done to “ease the burden” of the individual taxpaying debtor?

Thompson says the answer could lie in s 5 of the Limitation Act 1980, which provides “statutory amnesty for contract debts after six years’ of non-payment”. 

“Six years is not very long,” he writes, “but look out for the trap in s 29: the six-year period starts again whenever the debt is acknowledged in writing or a payment is made. 

“So keeping the wolf from the door by occasional morsels of payment actually ensures that it never goes away. The better course is complete inactivity or, more excitingly, going on the attack and denying liability.”

The debtor can also benefit from the Consumer Credit Act 1974, by requesting documents relating to the debt, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1977, which prevents debt-collectors from acting in an intimidating manner, he says. He adds that the increase in court fees may discourage creditors from starting legal proceedings.

 

Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll