header-logo header-logo

22 March 2013 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Down & out

istock_000012267319medium_0

What impact does bankruptcy have on a lump sum order obligation, asks Edward Heaton

In McRoberts v McRoberts [2012] EWHC 2966 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 12 (Nov), Hildyard J, in the Chancery Division, considered the impact of bankruptcy on a husband’s obligation to meet a lump sum order.

Background

The parties entered into a financial agreement in 2003, the terms of which were recorded in a consent order dated 1 April 2003. Among other things, the consent order provided for the husband, who was the applicant in the proceedings before Hildyard J, to make a lump sum payment of £450,000 to the wife, who was the respondent. The lump sum was stated to be payable by instalments, the final instalment to be paid by 31 March 2009. Interest was to accrue on any late payments and the entirety of the remaining balance of the lump sum outstanding was to fall due in the event of any payment becoming more than 14 days overdue.

The husband failed to make the payments that he was obliged to make and in March 2006

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll