header-logo header-logo

28 February 2025 / Professor Sukhninder Panesar
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Health
printer mail-detail

Does compassion defeat inheritance rights?

209434
The application of the forfeiture rule in assisted dying cases: Sukhninder Panesar examines a delicate balancing act for the courts
  • The Forfeiture Act 1982 confers upon the court a discretion to grant relief against the forfeiture of inheritance rights.
  • The forfeiture rule has become a source of much debate in the context of assisted dying cases.
  • The development of the case law shows that the courts will not take such decisions lightly, and a very high threshold of evidence is required in such cases.

The principle of law is that no person may benefit from killing another person. The matter is neatly illustrated in the decision of Sir Samuel Evans P in Re Crippen’s Estate [1911] P 108. Sir Samuel Evans P explained that it ‘is clear that the law is, that no person can obtain, or enforce, any rights resulting to him from his own crime; neither can his representative, claiming under him, obtain or enforce any such rights. The human mind revolts at the very idea that any other doctrine could be possible

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll